Just Competition
Just Competition for Competitive Intelligence Consultancies
Ensure Ethical, Strategic, and Effective Market Insights
Competitive intelligence (CI) consultancies operate at the intersection of business strategy, market analysis, and ethical surveillance. Their role is to help clients anticipate threats, exploit opportunities, and position themselves strategically—but how they compete and how they conduct intelligence gathering matters just as much as the insights they provide.
We apply the 7 Principles of Just Competition to ensure CI firms compete with integrity, operate ethically, and provide clients with intelligence that is actionable, legal, and strategically sound.
Principle #1. Just Cause – Intelligence Should Serve Strategic Decision-Making, Not Manipulation
The true purpose of competitive intelligence is to:
- Provide clients with insights that help them compete more effectively.
- Identify real threats and opportunities based on accurate data.
- Ensure businesses make informed, proactive decisions rather than reactive, desperate moves.
Unjust competitive intelligence:
- Gathers intelligence solely for corporate sabotage or regulatory attacks.
- Uses deception, hacking, or other unethical means to collect intelligence.
Guidance for CI Firms:
- Intelligence should anticipate market shifts, competitor moves, and industry trends—not undercut rivals unfairly.
- CI should focus on legal, ethical, and strategic insights that drive real business decisions.
Principle #2. Right Authority – Intelligence Gathering Must Operate Within Legal and Ethical Boundaries
Competitive intelligence must be conducted by qualified professionals who adhere to legal and ethical standards.
- Intelligence should be gathered through open-source research, industry analysis, and ethical HUMINT (Human Intelligence) techniques.
- CI firms should respect non-disclosure agreements, trade secrets, and privacy laws.
Unjust competitive intelligence:
- Bribes insiders, hacks, or obtains confidential information illegally.
- Spies on competitors in ways that violate the law or ethical guidelines.
Guidance for CI Firms:
- CI should be rooted in legal, ethical frameworks such as SCIP (Strategic Consortium of Intelligence Professionals) guidelines.
- Intelligence gathering should be transparent enough to stand up to scrutiny.
Principle #3. Right Intention – CI Should Provide Clarity, Not Just Fear or Misinformation
Competitive intelligence should be used to help businesses compete intelligently—not to create unnecessary panic or drive poor decision-making.
- CI firms should present insights objectively, and ensure recommendations are data-driven.
- The goal is to empower businesses with actionable intelligence, not just to confirm their biases.
Unjust competitive intelligence:
- Sells alarmist reports to push clients into unnecessary action.
- Provides manipulated intelligence that serves a predetermined agenda rather than reality.
Guidance for CI Firms:
- Intelligence should challenge assumptions and provide clarity, not just tell clients what they want to hear.
- Reports should be factual, objective, and supported by multiple sources.
Principle #4. Proportionality of Ends – Intelligence Should Be Used for Sustainable Competitive Advantage
Competitive intelligence should focus on long-term market positioning, not short-term destruction.
- Intelligence should be used to drive sustainable strategy, not to create instability.
- The benefits of intelligence should outweigh any negative impacts on industry health or public trust.
Unjust competitive intelligence:
- Encourages regulatory crackdowns on competitors through misleading intelligence.
- Uses intelligence purely to create stock price volatility or PR attacks.
Guidance for CI Firms:
- CI should be about long-term strategy, not just immediate tactical advantage.
- The best intelligence helps companies innovate and strengthen their position, not just weaken competitors.
Principle #5. Last Resort – Use Intelligence for Competitive Positioning Before You Resort to Direct Attacks
Before you recommend legal, regulatory, or aggressive countermeasures, CI firms should:
- Help clients reposition, out-innovate, or out-maneuver competitors.
- Explore strategic partnerships, market differentiation, and customer acquisition tactics first.
Unjust competitive intelligence:
- Jumps straight to aggressive legal action based on intelligence without exploration of alternative strategies.
- Encourages clients to launch negative PR campaigns based on weak or misleading intelligence.
Guidance for CI Firms:
- Clients should be advised to compete on their strengths before they engage in corporate warfare.
- Intelligence should be a tool for opportunity, not just a weapon against competitors.
Principle #6. Reasonable Hope of Success – Intelligence Should Guide Realistic, Achievable Strategies
CI firms should ensure that intelligence:
- Is actionable, with clear strategic implications.
- Focuses on areas where clients have a realistic competitive advantage.
Unjust competitive intelligence:
- Sells broad, vague intelligence reports that don’t offer clear, practical takeaways.
- Encourages clients to pursue strategies that are unrealistic based on intelligence findings.
Guidance for CI Firms:
- Intelligence should help businesses make decisions they can actually execute.
- CI reports should include feasibility assessments, risk analysis, and scenario planning.
Principle #7. The Aim of Progress – Competitive Intelligence Should Strengthen the Industry
The best CI firms elevate business strategy as a whole, and ensures companies:
- Compete smarter and more efficiently, and raise the bar for the entire industry.
- Develop better products, services, and market strategies based on intelligence.
Unjust competitive intelligence:
- Creates an environment of constant market instability through manipulative intelligence tactics.
- Encourages monopolistic behaviors by eliminating competitors instead of fostering true competition.
Guidance for CI Firms:
- Intelligence should help companies thrive through strategy, not just by eliminating threats.
- CI firms should contribute to ethical best practices and industry advancement.
Just Competition as the Future of Competitive Intelligence
The best CI firms don’t just sell information—they provide strategic insight that drives ethical, effective competition.
- They uncover hidden opportunities, not just threats.
- They provide intelligence that leads to real, actionable decisions.
- They help businesses navigate complex markets with clarity and precision.
When intelligence is gathered and used justly, it becomes a powerful tool for sustainable competitive advantage, rather than a weapon for short-term corporate warfare.